Multi-step task execution
Route structured agent calls, tool plans, and retries through a model lane sized for expected concurrency.
Use LighterHub as a private inference lane for suitable Hermes Agent, OpenClaw, internal agent, and tool-calling workflows when the client can route to an OpenAI-style endpoint.
Named tools and models are examples of compatible-client or model-family review, not partnership claims or guaranteed availability.
Strong candidates are tasks where success can be tested with real traces instead of generic benchmark claims.
Route structured agent calls, tool plans, and retries through a model lane sized for expected concurrency.
Support repo Q&A, edit planning, migration helpers, test explanation, and review prep when quality criteria are explicit.
Prompts and completions are processed for inference, not training. Request payloads are discarded by default.
The assessment separates calls that can be benchmarked safely from calls that should stay on a premium or fallback route.
A lower-cost route only makes sense when the full agent loop still completes reliably.
Track schema validity, required fields, tool selection, retry count, and whether fallback should trigger.
Compare representative traces against your current provider with clear pass, revise, and reject labels.
Quote capacity around concurrent sessions, context length, p95 latency, and cost per successful task.
First benchmark: 40 anonymized task traces with tool calls for ticket classification, retrieval, draft response, and escalation routing. Passing criteria: valid tool JSON, correct escalation decision, accepted draft quality, and fallback for ambiguous requests.
No. The safer plan is selective routing. Move only the agent calls that pass benchmark criteria and keep premium fallback for hard tasks, low-confidence outputs, or recovery.
Yes. A fallback rule is usually part of the recommendation, especially for tool-call failures, high-risk user requests, or work that misses the quality bar.
Tool-call JSON validity, task completion quality, retry rate, p95 latency, context length, cost per successful run, and fallback triggers are usually the most useful metrics.
Send the current provider, agent client or framework, rough monthly spend, expected concurrency, sample task categories, tool-call requirements, latency target, and quality bar. Do not send secrets or private customer records.
Include the current model/provider, monthly spend, expected concurrent sessions, required latency, tool-call requirements, and the quality bar that cannot regress.