Sample assessment

Example AI API cost assessment output.

This anonymized example shows the savings range, privacy notes, model-fit read, benchmark plan, and fallback rule LighterHub returns before a migration decision.

Scenario

Support ticket triage and draft responses.

ExampleCo uses a premium frontier model for every support request. The system classifies tickets, retrieves account context, drafts replies, and summarizes escalations.

Current model Premium

Single provider for all request types.

Volume 8M

Approximate tokens per month.

Privacy Private

Prompts and completions are processed for inference, not training, and payloads are discarded by default.

Potential 45-70%

Estimated savings if benchmarks pass.

Assessment report

Recommended routing split.

Move first

Classification and routing

Use a lower-cost route for topic classification, priority tagging, language detection, and internal routing because outputs are short and easy to evaluate.

Benchmark carefully

Draft responses

Test lower-cost candidate routes against saved tickets, tone requirements, refusal behavior, and support policy adherence before moving live drafts.

Keep premium

High-risk escalations

Keep billing disputes, account security, policy exceptions, and legal-sensitive responses on the current premium route or require human review.

First benchmark

Representative prompt set.

The first benchmark should test real workflow shape instead of public benchmark scores.

Prompt groups
  • 50 routine support tickets with known category and acceptable draft.
  • 20 ambiguous tickets that require escalation or human review.
  • 20 policy-sensitive tickets where the model should avoid overpromising.
  • 10 long-context tickets with previous-thread summaries.
Pass criteria
  • Classification accuracy within 2 percentage points of the current route.
  • No policy-sensitive draft sent without escalation flag.
  • p95 latency within the support team's working threshold.
  • Human review accepts at least 90% of routine draft responses.
Fallback rule

Quality protection matters more than maximum migration.

Recommended rule

Route routine classification and low-risk drafts through the lower-cost candidate only after benchmark pass. Send long, ambiguous, or policy-sensitive tickets to the current premium model, and require human sign-off for billing, security, legal, or account-closure topics.

Savings estimate

Expected range if the benchmark passes.

Likely savings

45-70% blended cost reduction

This assumes classification, routing, and routine drafts move to lower-cost inference while high-risk escalations stay premium.

Do not move yet

Escalations and sensitive account actions

The assessment should explicitly name what remains on the current route. A lower total savings number is better than breaking customer trust.

Next step

Get this kind of assessment for your workflow.

Send current provider, approximate monthly AI API spend, and workflow details. Do not send secrets or private customer records. LighterHub will return savings, privacy, model-fit, and benchmark guidance.